
Not Remembered Never Forgotten is in desperate need of a stringent line-edit. The text is far too often vague, confusing or reliant on opinion or assumption rather than research or hard fact; a couple of sentences are so poorly-written they are nonsensical; and in one particular case it's stated that people only adopt because they can't have biological children, which simply isn't the case. A strong edit would resolve all of these problems and produce a tighter, more coherent book with greatly-improved pacing and flow.
Then there are the careless errors: there is a punctuation error in the subtitle; a spelling mistake in the quote which is used to introduce the book; and several typos which really should have been corrected before this book was published. It's a shame because despite all of the problems I've listed this is a reasonably well-written book which isn't nearly as bad as many of the others I've reviewed here. I read as far as the tenth page, and I was disappointed not to have to read further.
2 comments:
Jane, I'm disappointed, too. I'd have been interested enough to pick this one up, but given it's so full of errors, I'm afraid it would've taken a few flying lessons before I got very far into it.
My second novel is about a birthmother who searches for the child she relinquished 38 years ago, so I have a strong interest in the subject of adoption.
Maggie, I know writing is hard, and self-editing doesn't come easily to most of us: but it's an essential part of a writer's armoury, and we really mustn't ignore that side of our craft if we want to succeed.
So many of the self-published books I've seen contain careless errors which could easily have been corrected. If they had been sorted out before publication then the books would have been so much better. I don't understand why so many writers shoot themselves in their metaphorical feet in this way. It's sad.
Post a Comment